- Anatomy of The Spine
- Back Pain in Children
- Caring for your Spine
- Emerging Spinecare Trends
- Evaluation of Spinal Disorders
- Exercise and The Spine
- Intervention - Spinal Disorders
- Intervertebral Disc
- Non Surgical Options
- Nutrition and Spinecare
- Options for Spine Treatments
- Pregnancy and Back Pain
- Prevalence of Spine Disorders
- Sleep and the Spine
- Spinecare Introduction
- Spinehealth and Disease
- Surgical Interventions
- Treatment with Medications
- Understanding Back Pain
YOU are here : Home > Spinecare Topics > Surgical%20Interventions > Failed Back Syndrome and Revision Surgery
Spinecare Topics
Surgical%20Interventions
Failed Back Syndrome and Revision Surgery
2
Failed Back Syndrome and Revision Surgery
Every year more than one hundred thousand patients have an elective spinal surgical procedure performed in the United States. A significant number of individuals will experience improvement but continue to experience spine related symptoms. A smaller but substantial percentage will develop new signs and symptoms as a result of the surgery that may be worse than the original presentation. Some patients will go on to have a repeat surgery or revision surgery at the same spine level. When surgery fails, the resulting condition is referred to as failed back syndrome (FBS). This condition has previously been referred to as “failed back surgery syndrome�.
The most important step in reducing the risk for failed back syndrome and revision surgery is an accurate diagnosis and proper patient selection before surgery. The initial diagnosis may be the single most important factor when attempting to prevent FBS. The diagnostic process should include identifying whether complaints are primarily related to the spine as well as identifying any contributing factors which may need to be addressed. The next step is determining whether surgery represents a reasonable approach for treating the problem. Surgery should always represent a “last resort� after more conservation methods have been considered or applied. According to Joseph Margulies, M.D., Ph.D. in the text titled “Spine Secrets�, poor outcome after initial spinal surgery can sometimes be attributed to one of the three “Ws�, wrong patient, wrong diagnosis and wrong surgery.
Concurrent factors, which increase the probability of a poor surgical outcome include multiple prior spinal surgeries, obstructive sleep apnea, cigarette smoking, fibromyalgia has also been associated with increased risk for post-operative pain syndrome. Additional risk factors include the development of excessive scar tissue (fibrosis/adhesions), recurrent or residual disc herniation, spinal stenosis, infection, pseudoarthrosis, and spinal instability. The presence of a blood disorder (systemic disease) such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythmatosis, thyroid disease, clotting disorders among other disorders can alter the healing (recovery) properties of the tissue which are operated on. These types of conditions need to identified before surgery and considered in the treatment plan whether it include surgery or not.
Technical errors during spine surgery can also lead to poor outcome. Examples include operating at the wrong level, inadequate surgical removal (decompression) of pressure off neurological structures, poor restoration of spinal alignment during surgery and malposition or failure of instrumentation used during surgery. Poor patient selection and operating on a part of the spine that is not the source of pain will lead to FBS.
Medical complications during spine surgery can also lead to poor outcome. This includes a heart attack (myocardial infarction), stroke, pulmonary embolus and anaphylactic reaction.
The most important step in reducing the risk for failed back syndrome and revision surgery is an accurate diagnosis and proper patient selection before surgery. The initial diagnosis may be the single most important factor when attempting to prevent FBS. The diagnostic process should include identifying whether complaints are primarily related to the spine as well as identifying any contributing factors which may need to be addressed. The next step is determining whether surgery represents a reasonable approach for treating the problem. Surgery should always represent a “last resort� after more conservation methods have been considered or applied. According to Joseph Margulies, M.D., Ph.D. in the text titled “Spine Secrets�, poor outcome after initial spinal surgery can sometimes be attributed to one of the three “Ws�, wrong patient, wrong diagnosis and wrong surgery.
Concurrent factors, which increase the probability of a poor surgical outcome include multiple prior spinal surgeries, obstructive sleep apnea, cigarette smoking, fibromyalgia has also been associated with increased risk for post-operative pain syndrome. Additional risk factors include the development of excessive scar tissue (fibrosis/adhesions), recurrent or residual disc herniation, spinal stenosis, infection, pseudoarthrosis, and spinal instability. The presence of a blood disorder (systemic disease) such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythmatosis, thyroid disease, clotting disorders among other disorders can alter the healing (recovery) properties of the tissue which are operated on. These types of conditions need to identified before surgery and considered in the treatment plan whether it include surgery or not.
Technical errors during spine surgery can also lead to poor outcome. Examples include operating at the wrong level, inadequate surgical removal (decompression) of pressure off neurological structures, poor restoration of spinal alignment during surgery and malposition or failure of instrumentation used during surgery. Poor patient selection and operating on a part of the spine that is not the source of pain will lead to FBS.
Medical complications during spine surgery can also lead to poor outcome. This includes a heart attack (myocardial infarction), stroke, pulmonary embolus and anaphylactic reaction.
2
